#Dvdxdv software upgrade
#Dvdxdv software plus
#Dvdxdv software mac

I use Handbrake for making best use of the most upgraded versions of X264. X264 IS the best and most advanced H264 codec around and has been for several years yet it is totally free. I suspect this is the fix to the problem, at least from my exporting point of view.

#Dvdxdv software upgrade

This cannot be done with MPSC, at least not at same time as you are reading from a DVD-video's contents.Īnother reason is I often take several sessions of editing a project, so a go-between format is required.Īnother reason is I rather like the X264 conversion abilities of HB for the finished edited work.īy the way I actually wrote to the MPSC developer about 3 years ago asking if he would upgrade the H264 codec to the newer X264 with its newer high profile options and other general improvements. This requires taking the audio out to edit separately and then returning. Why do I not edit the dvd in MPSC and then convert the finished work to H264? Because I often edit the sound separately so there's no obvious edits to the sound. MPSC does not seem to be able to do this at 100% quality for the initial conversion. No loss of quality during that initial save all information that exists is passed to the saved file. I am looking for a method to get DVD-video into a lossless video format. Perhaps I am getting slightly off topic in the above paragraph. ProRes saving at 30% or less? It's my guess ProRes throws away 50% or more of data rather than compressing it. QT's Animation saves standard video at around 1.5 GB/minute. Video cannot be compressed anywhere near music, but lossless compressed audio formats such as FLAC and Apple Lossless on average save at around 60% of size. It's my guess it throws away a lot of information during that initial save. I am continually feeling disappointed at the results after converting the finished edited work to H264.Īs a general observation: For standard video ProRes saves at less than 500 MB/minute. I am not surprised about the no response but would be nice to know if the MPSC developer has at least had a look at this issue.ġ3 months is a long time to review my own experience with using both ProRes and Animation formats for many projects.

Last year I wrote about this suspicion to the MPSC author but no response. I have a suspicion MPSC is unable to save any of the FCP QT codecs at 100% quality.

But again, I am looking for advice and would like to pass on my observations.Įver since this thread I have used mostly ProRes 422 HQ but I have not been happy with the results. Sorry to bring an old topic and thread back to life. Or is there a problem with MPeg Streamclip being able to access and obtain 100% quality when saving in Animation format despite the quality being set to 100%? (Does MPeg Streamclip use QuickTime's Animation codec or an open source equivalent that was probably really only designed for animation format playback? Ou y a-t-il un problème avec MPEG Streamclip pouvant accéder et obtenir à la qualité 100% quand économie dans le format d'animation en dépit de la qualité étant placée à 100% ?

Par la 10ème génération, il n'y avait aucune perte de qualité.įait l'utilisation QuickTime' de MPEG Streamclip codec d'animation de s ou un équivalent de source ouverte qui probablement a été vraiment seulement conçu pour le playback de format d'animation ? J'ai fait la même expérience utilisant QuickTime. Par la génération 4rth de sauver le dossier, le fond m'a rappelé une image de JPEG de qualité inférieure.

J'ai fait une expérience : Après 3 générations d'économiser dans le format d'animation utilisant MPEG Streamclip, la perte de qualité était évidente.

#Dvdxdv software plus

Cependant, si je sauve une vidéo dans le format d'animation avec MPEG Streamclip, il est toujours plus petit que le dossier d'équivalent de QuickTime.

#Dvdxdv software mac

J'emploie fréquemment le format d'Animation d'Apple parce que c'est le seul véritable format visuel sans perte que le Mac offre. Je ne parle pas Francais mais ai eu besoin d'une réponse à cette question ainsi ai utilisé réellement un traducteur en ligne.